- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-487/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Multiópticas v EUIPO — Nike Innovate (Representation of two black geometrical shapes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark representing two black geometrical shapes — Earlier EU and national figurative marks mó — Relative ground for refusal — No damage to reputation — Non-similarity of the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0487
62022TA0487
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 314/9
(Case T-487/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark representing two black geometrical shapes - Earlier EU and national figurative marks mó - Relative ground for refusal - No damage to reputation - Non-similarity of the signs - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 314/12)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Multiópticas S. Coop. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. López Camba and A. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Nike Innovate CV (Beaverton, Oregon, United States)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2022 (Case R 1762/2021-4)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Multiópticas S. Coop. and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140
(2023/C 314/12)