- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-315/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de Zaragoza (Spain) lodged on 29 May 2017 — Pilar Centeno Meléndez v Universidad de Zaragoza
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0315
62017CN0315
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 269/9
(Case C-315/17)
(2017/C 269/13)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Pilar Centeno Meléndez
Defendant: Universidad de Zaragoza
Questions referred
1.Is Clause 4(1) of the Framework Agreement annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>) applicable to the horizontal career increment claimed by the applicant, on the basis that it is an employment condition, or, rather, does the increment constitute an element of remuneration with the characteristics described in the present order that depends on the subjective qualities of the recipient which have been gained by working for a number of years under a system based on increasing levels of difficulty and responsibility and on continuity, specialisation and professionalism?
2.If the previous question is answered in the affirmative and the Court of Justice considers [the increment] to be an employment condition for the purposes of Clause 4(1) of the Framework Agreement, is the difference in remuneration justified on objective grounds?
Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP.
OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43.
* * *
Language of the case: Spanish