- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-182/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — PKK v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures imposed on the PKK with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Applicability to situations of armed conflict — Terrorist group — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Decision taken by a competent authority — Authority of a third State — Review — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0182
62021TA0182
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/36
(Case T-182/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures imposed on the PKK with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 - Applicability to situations of armed conflict - Terrorist group - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Decision taken by a competent authority - Authority of a third State - Review - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection)
(2023/C 63/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) (represented by: A. van Eik and T. Buruma, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of:
—Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/142 of 5 February 2021 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1132 (OJ 2021 L 43, p. 14);
—Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/138 of 5 February 2021 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1128 (OJ 2021 L 43, p. 1);
—Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1192 of 19 July 2021 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision 2021/142 (OJ 2021 L 258, p. 42);
—Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1188 of 19 July 2021 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation 2021/138 (OJ 2021 L 258, p. 14);
—Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/152 of 3 February 2022 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision 2021/1192 (OJ 2022 L 25, p. 13);
—Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/147 of 3 February 2022 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation 2021/1188 (OJ 2022 L 25, p. 1), in so far as those measures concern the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.