- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-71/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — Promat v OHIM — Prosima Comercial (PROSIMA PROSIMA COMERCIAL S.A.) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark PROSIMA PROSIMA COMERCIAL S.A. — Earlier national word mark PROMINA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Absence of similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TA0071
62008TA0071
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
(Case T-71/08)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark PROSIMA PROSIMA COMERCIAL S.A. - Earlier national word mark PROMINA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Absence of similarity between the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2009/C 205/62
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Promat GmbH (Ratingen, Germany) (represented initially by S. Beckmann, and subsequently by H. Alt, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by A. Poch, and subsequently by G. Schneider, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Prosima Comercial, SA (Barcelona, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2007 (Case R 574/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Promat GmbH and Prosima Comercial, SA.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Promat GmbH to pay the costs.
* * *
(1) OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.