EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-750/21: Action brought on 26 November 2021 — Beauty Biosciences v EUIPO — Société de Recherche Cosmétique (BIO-BEAUTÉ)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0750

62021TN0750

November 26, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.1.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/34

(Case T-750/21)

(2022/C 51/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Beauty Biosciences LLC (Dallas, Texas, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société de Recherche Cosmétique SARL (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark BIO-BEAUTÉ — European Union trade mark No 13 609 631

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 September 2021 in Joined Cases R 1871/2020-4 and R 1891/2020-4.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

partly annul the contested decision in the sense of declaring the contested trademark invalid for the goods in Class 3: ‘dentifrices; essential oils; perfumes, toilet water, eau de cologne; incense; perfume water’;

partly annul the contested decision in the sense of declaring the contested trademark invalid for the goods in Class 3: ‘Cosmetics; body deodorants; Extracts of plant for cosmetic purposes; Soaps, cleansing milk; Cosmetic creams, gels, milks, lotions, masks, pomades, powders, serums and preparations for skin care; Anti-wrinkle preparations; Cosmetic preparations for lip care; Sun-tanning preparations (cosmetics), after-sun preparations (cosmetics); Cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; Depilatories; Hair products (hair and scalp care preparations); Baths (Cosmetic preparations for -); Make-up and make up removing preparations; Preparations for shaving and after-shave preparations’;

alter the contested decision it in the sense of declaring the contested trademark invalid for the goods in Class 3: ‘dentifrices; essential oils; perfumes, toilet water, eau de cologne; incense; perfume water’;

alter the contested decision and alter it in the sense of declaring the contested trademark invalid for the goods in Class 3: ‘Cosmetics; body deodorants; Extracts of plant for cosmetic purposes; Soaps, cleansing milk; Cosmetic creams, gels, milks, lotions, masks, pomades, powders, serums and preparations for skin care; Anti-wrinkle preparations; Cosmetic preparations for lip care; Sun-tanning preparations (cosmetics), after-sun preparations (cosmetics); Cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; Depilatories; Hair products (hair and scalp care preparations); Baths (Cosmetic preparations for -); Make-up and make up removing preparations; Preparations for shaving and after-shave preparations’;

order Société de Recherche Cosmétique S.A.R.L. to pay the costs incurred by Beauty Biosciences LLC in the present action, in the proceedings before the Board of Appeals and in the proceedings before the Cancellation Division.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that the EUTM No 13 609 631 BIO-BEAUTÉ is not descriptive in connection to the goods in Class 3 ‘dentifrices; essential oils; perfumes, toilet water, eau de cologne; incense; perfume water’;

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that the EUTM No 13 609 631 BIO-BEAUTÉ does not lack distinctive character in connection to the goods in Class 3 ‘dentifrices; essential oils; perfumes, toilet water, eau de cologne; incense; perfume water’;

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that the EUTM No 13 609 631 BIO-BEAUTÉ has acquired distinctive character in connection to the goods in Class 3 ‘Cosmetics; body deodorants; Extracts of plant for cosmetic purposes; Soaps, cleansing milk; Cosmetic creams, gels, milks, lotions, masks, pomades, powders, serums and preparations for skin care; Anti-wrinkle preparations; Cosmetic preparations for lip care; Sun-tanning preparations (cosmetics), after-sun preparations (cosmetics); Cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; Depilatories; Hair products (hair and scalp care preparations); Baths (Cosmetic preparations for -); Make-up and make up removing preparations; Preparations for shaving and after-shave preparations’.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia