- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-380/12: Action brought on 22 August 2012 — Demon International v OHIM — Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo (DEMON)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0380
62012TN0380
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.10.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 331/28
(Case T-380/12)
(2012/C 331/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Demon International, LC (Orem, United States) (represented by: T. Krüger, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo (Thiene (VI), Italy)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 June 2012 in Case R 1845/2011-4;
—order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs of the action and of the appeal proceedings R 1845/2011-4.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Demon’ for goods in Class 9 — Community trade mark No 6 375 398
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Demon International, LC
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: International word mark ‘DEMON’ for goods in Class 28
Decision of the Cancellation Division: The application for a declaration of invalidity was granted in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was allowed and the application for a declaration of invalidity dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.