- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-499/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — ZU v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Sick leave — Negative opinion by the medical service — Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system — Acts not amenable to review — Acts not adversely affecting an official — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Premature challenge — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0499
62019TB0499
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.6.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/16
(Case T-499/19) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Sick leave - Negative opinion by the medical service - Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system - Acts not amenable to review - Acts not adversely affecting an official - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Premature challenge - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 191/21)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: R. Spac and S. Marquardt, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the alleged decisions of the EEAS of 31 August 2018 and 10 January 2019, of the European Commission note of 30 August 2018 providing for a reduction of the applicant’s sick leave and, so far as necessary, of the Commission’s decision of 1 April 2019 rejecting his complaint of 30 November 2018 against that note and against any subsequent decision to deduct his absence from 28 to 31 August 2018 from his annual leave.
Operative part of the order
1.The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.ZU shall pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.