- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-318/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Ischia (Italy) lodged on 15 July 2008 — Filomena Califano v Wind SpA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CN0318
62008CN0318
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.9.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 236/10
(Case C-318/08)
(2008/C 236/16)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Filomena Califano
Defendant: Wind SpA
Question referred
Do the Community rules in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Directive 2002/22/EC, Directive 1999/44/EC, Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC and Directive 1998/257/EC have direct effect and must they be interpreted as meaning that disputes ‘in the area of electronic communications between end-users and operators concerning non-compliance with the rules on universal service and on the rights of end-users, as laid down in legislation, decisions of the Regulatory Authority, contractual terms and service charters’ (the disputes contemplated by Article 2 of Decision No 173/07/CONS of the Regulatory Authority) must not be made subject to a mandatory attempt at conciliation without which proceedings in that regard may not be brought before the courts, thus taking precedence over the rule laid down in Article 3(1) of Decision No 173/07/CONS?
Language of the case: Italian
(1) OJ L 108, p. 51.
(2) OJ L 171, p. 12.
(3) Commission Recommendation.
(4) Commission Recommendation.