I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2017/C 369/52)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2017 on the State aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Poland for the tax on the retail sector, notified under document C(2017) 4449; and
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission incorrectly classified the Polish tax on the retail sector as State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU by reason of a manifest error in its assessment of the condition of selectivity.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision contains a deficient and inadequate statement of reasons.