I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Binding tariff information decisions - Refusal to grant access - Definition of ‘document’ - Substantial investment - Exception relating to the protection of personal data - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party)
(C/2025/1423)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: eClear AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Thomas and J. Jasper, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Burón Pérez, A. Spina and M. Heller, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 3193 final of 8 May 2023, in so far as it only granted the applicant access to the non-confidential versions of valid binding tariff information decisions (‘BTI decisions’) and refused access to other BTI decisions adopted between 1 January 2004 and 14 September 2022.
The Court:
1.Annuls section 2.4 and section 4, only in so far as that latter section refers to invalid binding tariff information decisions, of Commission Decision C(2023) 3193 final of 8 May 2023;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 155, 2.5.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1423/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—