- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-160/11: Order of the General Court of 6 July 2011 — Petroci v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Removal from the list of persons concerned — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0160(01)
62011TB0160(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.9.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 282/22
(Case T-160/11)(1)
(Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Removal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 282/45
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Société nationale d'opérations pétrolières de la Cote d’Ivoire Holding (Petroci Holding) (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36), and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as those acts introduce restrictive measures which adversely affect the applicant.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate.
2.The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.
3.There is no need to adjudicate on the application of the European Commission for leave to intervene
(1) OJ C 139 of 7.5.2011.
* * *
Language of the case: French