I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2012/C 258/44
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Manufacturing Support and Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: F. Esclatine and S. Perrotet, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
—Annul Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012;
—Order the Council to pay all the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law, six of which are in essence similar to the first six pleas in law raised in Case T-509/10 Manufacturing Support and Procurement Kala Naft v Council. (1)
The applicant raises an additional plea in law alleging that the contested regulation is unlawful by reason of the unlawfulness of the preceding measures which were annulled by the judgment of the General Court in Case T-509/10 Manufacturing Support and Procurement Kala Naft v Council [2012] ECR II-0000.
(1)
OJ 2010 C 346, p. 57.