EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-232/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 3 June 2020 — NP v Daimler AG

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0232

62020CN0232

June 3, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.8.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/33

(Case C-232/20)

(2020/C 279/44)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NP

Defendant: Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin

Questions referred

1.Is the assignment of a temporary agency worker to a user undertaking no longer to be regarded as ‘temporary’ for the purposes of Article 1 of the Temporary Agency Work Directive (1) as soon as the employment takes place in a job which is permanent and not performed as cover?

2.Is the assignment of a temporary agency worker for a period of less than 55 months no longer to be regarded as ‘temporary’ for the purposes of Article 1 of the Temporary Agency Work Directive?

If the answer to Question 1 and/or Question 2 is in the affirmative, the following additional questions arise:

3.1Does the temporary agency worker have an entitlement to the establishment of an employment relationship with the user undertaking even if the national law does not provide for such a penalty before 1 April 2017?

3.2Does a national provision such as Paragraph 19(2) of the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz (Law regulating temporary agency work) infringe Article 1 of the Temporary Agency Work Directive where it prescribes an individual maximum assignment period of 18 months for the first time as from 1 April 2017, but expressly excludes the taking into account of prior periods of assignment, although the assignment could no longer be classified as temporary if the prior periods of assignment were taken into account?

3.3Can the extension of the individual maximum assignment period be left to the discretion of the parties to a collective agreement? If so, does this also apply to parties to a collective agreement who exercise competence not over the employment relationship of the temporary agency worker concerned, but over the sector in which the user undertaking is active?

* Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work (OJ 2008 L 327, p. 9).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia