- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-712/20: Action brought on 3 December 2020 — Škoda Investement v EUIPO — Škoda Auto (Device of arrow with wing)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0712
62020TN0712
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/57
(Case T-712/20)
(2021/C 35/75)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Škoda Investement a.s. (Plzeň, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Škoda Auto a.s. (Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Representation of a device of arrow with wing) — Application for registration No 17 991 861
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2020 in Case R 284/2020-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 9 December 2019 concerning Opposition No B003083007 to the full extent;
—remit the case to the Opposition Division for further examination with respect to all goods and services applied for;
—order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Incorrect assessment of the legal effects of a procedurally illegal first-instance decision.