I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 211/77)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Wessel-Werk GmbH (Reichshof, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wolf PVG GmbH & Co. KG (Vlotho, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: The applicant
Design at issue: Community design No 725932-0004 (Suction nozzles for vacuum cleaners)
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 February 2016 in Case R 1652/2014-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the unsuccessful parties to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.