- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-439/21: Order of the General Court of 19 July 2022 — Anglofranchise v EUIPO — Bugrey (BOY LONDON) (European Union trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0439
62021TB0439
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 359/73
(Case T-439/21) (*)
(European Union trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 359/91)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Anglofranchise Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi, N. Parrotta and R. Perotti, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Yuliya Bugrey (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO of 23 April 2021 (Case R 459/2020-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Yuliya Bugrey and Anglofranchise.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Anglofranchise Ltd and Yuliya Bugrey shall bear their own costs and each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*) Language of the case: Italian.
(1) OJ C 357, 6.9.2021.