I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(C/2024/5244)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: K-Way SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Sindico, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Adorno Gubbini (Bagnolo Mella, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark representing a rectangular strip with vertical long sides – EU trade mark No 3 971 561
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 May 2024 in Case R 1748/2023-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—principally, vary the contested decision in so far as it did not find the use of mark No 3 971 561 proven, for the purposes of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in respect of goods in Class 18, namely, handbags, briefcases, purses, shopping bags, and vanity cases [not fitted], and that on the basis of arguments contained in the present action in conjunction with the proof and documents in the first two stages of proceedings and, without subsequent reference back, uphold the validity thereof;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision and, accordingly, remit the case to the Board of Appeal;
—determine the amount of costs to be borne by EUIPO.
Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5244/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—