- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-238/14: Order of the General Court of 26 April 2016 — EGBA and RGA v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Gambling and betting — Aid envisaged by France for horse-racing companies — Parafiscal levy collected on online horse-race betting — Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Association — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0238
62014TB0238
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/19
(Case T-238/14) (*)
((Action for annulment - State aid - Gambling and betting - Aid envisaged by France for horse-racing companies - Parafiscal levy collected on online horse-race betting - Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market - Association - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))
(2016/C 222/23)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) (Brussels, Belgium) and The Remote Gambling Association (RGA) (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S.-P. Brankin, Solicitor, T. De Meese, E. Wijckmans and M. Mudrony, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2014/19/EU of 19 June 2013 on State aid No SA.30753 (C 34/10) (ex N 140/10) which France is planning to implement for horse-racing companies (OJ 2014 L 14, p. 17).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) and The Remote Gambling Association (RGA) shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
3.The French Republic shall bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.