I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-205/20)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark I-cosmetics - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 338/25)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Angela Frommer (Unterschleißheim, Germany) (represented by: F. Remmertz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Minerva GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Dissmann, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2020 (Case R 675/2019-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Minerva and Ms Frommer.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Angela Frommer to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);
3.Orders Minerva GmbH to bear its own costs.
OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.