I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 72/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Glimarpol sp. z o.o. (Bytom, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Metar sp. z o.o. (Gliwice, Poland)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: European Union design 2 125 435-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2018 in Case R 1615/2017-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and refer the case back to EUIPO for reconsideration;
—alter the contested decision by stating that there are no grounds for declaring Registered Community design No 002125435-001 as invalid;
—award the costs in the applicant’s favour.
—Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.