- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-689/17: Action brought on 5 October 2017 — Top Cable v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0689
62017TN0689
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-689/17)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Top Cable, SA (Rubí, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Sellés Marco, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived the applicant of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities it owned;
—Order the Board to pay the applicant EUR 52000000 as damages for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’);
—Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case;
—Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment up to its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points.
—Order the SRB to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-659/17, Vallina Fonseca v SRB.