I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-204/22) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of a ‘court or tribunal’ - Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body - Exercise of judicial or administrative functions - Duty of cooperation of the body making the reference - Directives 89/665/EEC and 2014/24/EU - Public procurement - National regulatory body for public procurement procedures - Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis - Power to impose penalties - Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts - No dispute before the referring body - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2023/C 63/14)
Language of the case: Slovakian
Proceedings brought against: Úrad pre dohľad nad zdravotnou starostlivosťou, Všeobecná zdravotná poisťovňa, a.s., Dôvera zdravotná poist’ovňa a.s., Union zdravotná poisťovňa, a.s.
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie (Public Procurement Regulatory Authority, Slovakia), by decision of 16 March 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
(*) Date lodged: 16.3.2022.