- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-488/13: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte — Bulgaria) — ‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS v ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 — Definition of ‘uncontested pecuniary claims’ — Insolvency proceedings — Extra-judicial enforcement order relating to a contested claim — Claim for payment out of the insolvency estate, on the basis of such an enforcement order — Situation falling outside the scope of Regulation No 1896/2006 — Court clearly lacking jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CB0488
62013CB0488
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 431/5
(Case C-488/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 - Definition of ‘uncontested pecuniary claims’ - Insolvency proceedings - Extra-judicial enforcement order relating to a contested claim - Claim for payment out of the insolvency estate, on the basis of such an enforcement order - Situation falling outside the scope of Regulation No 1896/2006 - Court clearly lacking jurisdiction))
(2014/C 431/09)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: ‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS
Defendants: ‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD
Intervening parties: Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, ‘Aset Menidzhmant’ EAD, ‘Ol Siyz Balgaria’ OOD, ‘Si Dzhi Ef — aktsionerna obshtnost’ AD, ‘Silvar Biych’ EAD, ‘Rudersdal’ EOOD, ‘Kota Enerdzhi’ EAD, Chavdar Angelov Angelov
Operative part of the order
The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte (Bulgaria).
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.