EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-15/23 P: Appeal brought on 17 January 2023 by Arne-Patrik Heinze against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 9 November 2022 in Case T-610/21, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Heinze (K K WATER)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0015
62023CN0015
January 17, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.6.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 223/10
(Case C-15/23 P)
(2023/C 223/13)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Arne-Patrik Heinze (represented by: N. Dauskardt, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: L'Oréal, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 11 May 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Mr Arne-Patrik Heinze should bear his own costs.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.