I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public procurement - Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure - Enforcement of the provisional security - Automatic application of that penalty - Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders - Principle of proportionality - Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3389)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl
Defendant: Consip SpA
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), made by decision of 18 April 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
(1) Dated lodged: 22.4.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3389/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—