EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-285/24, Coopservice: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl v Consip SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CB0285

62024CB0285

March 12, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3389

30.6.2025

(Case C-285/24,

Coopservice)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public procurement - Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure - Enforcement of the provisional security - Automatic application of that penalty - Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders - Principle of proportionality - Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(C/2025/3389)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl

Defendant: Consip SpA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), made by decision of 18 April 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) Dated lodged: 22.4.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3389/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia