- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-261/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Spirig Pharma v OHIM (Daylong)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0261
62015TN0261
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.7.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 245/39
(Case T-261/15)
(2015/C 245/47)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Spirig Pharma (Egerkingen, Switzerland) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: figurative mark containing the word element ‘Daylong’ — Application for registration No 12 537 627
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2015 in Case R 2455/2014-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant in the course of the proceedings before the fourth Board of Appeal of the Office.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009, read in conjunction with Article 75 of the same regulation;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.