I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-221/22)
(2022/C 237/86)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Pharmaselect International Beteiligungs GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: S. Jackermeier and D. Wiedemann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: OmniActive Health Technologies Ltd (Mumbai, India)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark LUTAMAX — European Union trade mark No 3 472 974
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2022 in Joined Cases R 524/2021-1 and R 649/2021-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order that European Union trademark No 3 472 974 LUTAMAX remain registered for the following goods:
Class 5: Medicines for human and animals use; Dietetic substances adapted for medical use; Dietary supplements adapted for medical or dietetic use; Vitamin preparations adapted for medical or dietetic use; Eye care preparations (for pharmaceutical purposes); none of the aforesaid goods for veterinary purposes;
Class 29: Dietetic foodstuffs and food supplements, not adapted for medical use (included in class 29); Edible oils and fats;
Class 30: Dietetic foodstuffs and food supplements, not adapted for medical use (included in class 30);
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.