EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-221/22: Action brought on 25 April 2022 — Pharmaselect International v EUIPO — OmniActive Health Technologies (LUTAMAX)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0221

62022TN0221

April 25, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/66

(Case T-221/22)

(2022/C 237/86)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Pharmaselect International Beteiligungs GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: S. Jackermeier and D. Wiedemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: OmniActive Health Technologies Ltd (Mumbai, India)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark LUTAMAX — European Union trade mark No 3 472 974

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2022 in Joined Cases R 524/2021-1 and R 649/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

order that European Union trademark No 3 472 974 LUTAMAX remain registered for the following goods:

Class 5: Medicines for human and animals use; Dietetic substances adapted for medical use; Dietary supplements adapted for medical or dietetic use; Vitamin preparations adapted for medical or dietetic use; Eye care preparations (for pharmaceutical purposes); none of the aforesaid goods for veterinary purposes;

Class 29: Dietetic foodstuffs and food supplements, not adapted for medical use (included in class 29); Edible oils and fats;

Class 30: Dietetic foodstuffs and food supplements, not adapted for medical use (included in class 30);

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia