I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
16.12.2024
(C/2024/7380)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: SiLog GmbH (Meudt, Germany) (represented by: D. Lindloff, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Silog SAS (Bruges, France)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark Si Log International – EU trade mark No 18 069 684
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 August 2024 in Case R 343/2023-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and amend it to the effect that the application for a declaration of invalidity filed by Silog SAS on 15 September 2021 is rejected and the decision of the Cancellation Division of EUIPO of 19 December 2022 is annulled;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs before this Court and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs of the cancellation and appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 16(1)(b) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the form of an infringement of the right to be heard.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7380/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—