- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-542/12: Action brought on 18 December 2012 — Mikhalchanka v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0542
62012TN0542
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.2.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 55/17
(Case T-542/12)
2013/C 55/30
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Aliaksei Mikhalchanka (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
—Annul Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant;
—Annul Council Regulation (EU) NO 1041/2012 of 6 November 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant;
—Annul Council Implementing Regulation No 1017/2012 of 6 November 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant;
—Order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-196/11 AX v Council.
(*) Language of the case: French.