I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-609/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Access to the documents of the Institutions - ‘TACIS programme’ - Contract concluded by the Commission - Termination of the contract - Dispute between the contracting parties - Application for access to documents - Manifest inadmissibility)
2011/C 211/15
Language of the case: German
Appellant: Dieter C. Umbach (represented by: M. Stephani, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, Agents)
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010 in Case T-474/08 Umbach v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 2 September 2008 refusing the appellant access to certain information included in documents relating to a contract concluded between the appellant and the Commission and concerning assistance with the drafting of an administrative code on behalf of the Russian Federation in the context of the TACIS programme — Application for access concerning the dispute between the appellant and the Commission following the termination of that contract — Infringement of Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Mr Umbach shall pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 89, 19.3.2011.
* * *
Language of the case: German.