EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-398/24, Pome: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 6 June 2024 – A v B

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0398

62024CN0398

June 6, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/4848

12.8.2024

(Case C-398/24, Pome)

(C/2024/4848)

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: A

Defendant and respondent: B

Question referred

Is the fact that the validity of an agreement conferring jurisdiction is subject to the condition that the natural persons who have concluded it are acting in the course of economic and professional activity, as provided for in Paragraph 106(1)(1) of the Estonian Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that an agreement conferring jurisdiction concluded between natural persons is to be null and void if it infringes Paragraph 104(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, under which a dispute between natural persons which is to be heard by a court pursuant to an agreement conferring jurisdiction must be connected with the economic or professional activity of both parties, a matter relating to the substantive validity of an agreement conferring jurisdiction within the meaning of the first sentence in fine of Article 25(1) (‘unless the agreement is null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of that Member State’) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast)?

(1) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4848/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia