I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2021/C 217/79)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Säckingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Theis and F. Hauck, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VIPI Indústria, Comércio, Exportação E Importação De Produtos Odontológicos LTDA (Pirassununga, Brazil)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte — International registration designating the European Union No 1 346 271
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 February 2021 in Case R 818/2020-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—alter the contested decision in the way that the opposition against the European Union part of the international registration No 1 346 271 is dismissed in its entirety and that the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO are imposed on the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
—annul the contested decision as an auxiliary request;
—impose the costs of these proceedings before the General Court on EUIPO.
—Misapplication of Articles 47(5) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.