- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-142/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2015 — De Almeida Pereira v Eurojust (Civil service — Eurojust staff — Member of the temporary staff — Vacancy notice — Candidate selection procedure — Examination of applications by a selection board — Admission to the next stage of the selection procedure — Conditions — Scoring of selection criteria — Required points threshold — Rejection of application — Action manifestly lacking any basis in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FB0142
62014FB0142
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case F-142/14) (1)
‛(Civil service — Eurojust staff — Member of the temporary staff — Vacancy notice — Candidate selection procedure — Examination of applications by a selection board — Admission to the next stage of the selection procedure — Conditions — Scoring of selection criteria — Required points threshold — Rejection of application — Action manifestly lacking any basis in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)’
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Manuel Antonio De Almeida Pereira (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: E.H. Schulze, lawyer)
Defendant: Eurojust (represented by: C. Deboyser and J. Carmona-Bermejo, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to the second phase of the selection procedure, in the context of his candidature for the post of Advisor to the Office of the President of Eurojust.
Operative part of the order
1)The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
2)Mr De Almeida Pereira is to bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by Eurojust.
(1) OJ C 81, 9/3/2015, p. 30.