- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-54/16: Action brought on 5 February 2016 — Netguru v EUIPO (NETGURU)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0054
62016TN0054
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.3.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 111/34
(Case T-54/16)
(2016/C 111/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Netguru sp. z o.o. (Poznań, Poland) (represented by: K. Jarosiński, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘NETGURU’ — Application for registration No 12 994 166
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 December 2015 in Case R 144/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—set aside in its entirety the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 18 December 2015 in Case R 144/2015-5;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Breach of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Breach of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Misapplication of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.