- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-244/12: Action brought on 30 May 2012 — Unister v OHIM (fluege.de)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0244
62012TN0244
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.7.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 217/28
(Case T-244/12)
2012/C 217/59
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Unister GmbH (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by H. Hug and A. Kessler-Jensch, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 March 2012 in Case R 2149/2011-1;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘fluege.de’ for goods in Classes 25, 28, 35, 39, 41 and 43
Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law:
—infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009
—infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009