I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Case T-56/24)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark BKT - Earlier international registration designating the European Union - Word mark BTK - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/730)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB (Klaipėda, Lithuania) (represented by: V. Viešūnaitė, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: BTK Befrachtungs-und Transportkontor GmbH (Raubling, Germany) (represented by: D. Wiedemann and L. Schene, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2023 (Case R 637/2023-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB to bear its owns costs and to pay those incurred by BTK Befrachtungs-und Transportkontor GmbH;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
OJ C C/2024/2057, 18.3.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/730/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2025:730
15
—
—