EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-314/14: Action brought on 29 April 2014 — Borde and Carbonium v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0314

62014TN0314

April 29, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/24

(Case T-314/14)

2014/C 261/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Alexandre Borde (Paris, France) and Carbonium (Paris) (represented by: A. Herzberg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul respondent’s decisions dated 19 and 20 February 2014 to terminate applicant No 1’s assignment in relation to the global GCCA and the Intra-ACP GCCA evaluation programmes;

order respondent to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements, including the applicants’ right to be heard and the obligation to give reasons for decisions.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the Treaty on European Union, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the defendant having violated the applicants’ rights to be treated in a fair, equitable and non-arbitrary manner and the applicants’ right to protection of their reputation.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the attacked decisions constitute a misuse of the defendant’s powers.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia