- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 December 2010.#Ioan Anghel v Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Bacău and Administraţia Finanţelor Publice Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Curtea de Apel Bacău - Romania.#Reference for a preliminary ruling - Failure to provide a factual description - Inadmissibility.#Case C-441/10.
ECLI:EU:C:2010:748
62010CO0441
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-441/10)
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Failure to provide a factual description – Inadmissibility
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions asked without enough detail given of the facts – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 92(1) and 103(1)) (see paras 9-12, operative part)
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Curtea de Apel Secţia Bacău Secţia Comercială, Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal – Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States – Environmental tax on vehicles on their first registration in a Member State – Compatibility of the national rules with Article 110 TFEU – Discrimination in relation to second-hand vehicles already registered in the territory of that Member State and not subject to that tax on a subsequent sale or new registration.
Operative part
The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Curtea de Apel Bacău by decision of 1 September 2010 is manifestly inadmissible.