- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-457/11: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2013 — Valeo Vision v Commission (Application for annulment — Common Customs Tariff — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff heading — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0457
62011TA0457
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.10.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 313/24
(Case T-457/11)( <span class="super">1</span> )
(Application for annulment - Common Customs Tariff - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff heading - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
2013/C 313/46
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Valeo Vision (Bobigny, France) (represented by: R. Ledru, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, B. R. Killmann and L. Keppenne, Agents)
Re:
Application for the annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 603/2011 of the Commission of 20 June 2011 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2011 L 163, p. 10).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action as inadmissible.
2.Orders Valeo Vision to pay its own costs and those of the European Commission
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.