EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Fennelly delivered on 1 February 1996. # Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Non-transposition of Directive 91/156/EEC - Waste. # Case C-160/95.

ECLI:EU:C:1996:29

61995CC0160

February 1, 1996
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL

FENNELLY delivered on 1 February 1996 (1)

Commission v Hellenic Republic

2. Member States were required by Article 2(1) of the Directive to take the measures necessary to comply with it not later than 1 April 1993, and immediately inform the Commission thereof. Article 2(2) of the Directive obliges the Member States also to inform the Commission of the texts of the main provisions of national law which they have adopted in the field covered by the Directive.

3. Article 189 of the Treaty obliges Member States to adopt the national measures necessary to ensure the attainment of the objectives of each directive. This specific requirement is reinforced by their general duty pursuant to Article 5 of the Treaty to take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of this Treaty or resulting from action taken by the institutions of the Community.

4. The Greek Government has not disputed its failure to implement the Directive within the time-limit laid down or, indeed, at all. The Government submitted in both its defence of 20 June 1995 and its rejoinder of 8 August 1995 that a ministerial order which would, if adopted, implement the Directive was at an advanced stage of preparation and that only the signature of the relevant ministers was lacking. The delay, it is claimed, is attributable to a parallel, general revision of national waste laws currently being undertaken. However, as the Commission correctly contended in its reply of 3 July 1995, by reference to the constant case-law of the Court, Member States may not plead practical or other difficulties experienced in implementing a directive so as to justify their failure to respect, within the prescribed time-limit, the obligations imposed on them by Community directives.

Conclusion

(1) declare that by not implementing within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 amending Directive 75/442/EEC on waste, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the third paragraph of Article 189 of the Treaty and under Article 2 of Directive 91/156;

(2) order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs of these proceedings.

(1) Original language: English.

(2) Respectively, OJ 1991 L 78, p. 32, and OJ 1975 L 194, p. 39.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia