- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-789/23, Registrų centras: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 21 December 2023 — I. J. v Registrų centras
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0789
62023CN0789
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1676
4.3.2024
(Case C-789/23, Registrų centras)
(C/2024/1676)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant at first instance and appellant: I. J.
Defendant at first instance and respondent: Registrų centras VĮ
Question referred
Must Article 21(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which a marriage contract concluded in another Member State of the European Union may not be recorded in the Register of Marriage Contracts if the marriage contract does not contain the personal identification number of at least one of the parties to that contract, as provided by the Population Register of the Republic of Lithuania, where, in circumstances such as those of the present case, the competent authorities of the Member State in which the marriage contract was concluded refuse to provide an extract from that contract supplemented by the relevant personal identification data?
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1676/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
Language of the case: Lithuanian