I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
29.7.2024
(C/2024/4598)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Christophe Oberlin (Paris, France) (represented by: G. Devers, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—order the Commission to send the documents requested to the General Court so that it can assess itself if the risk of the judicial proceedings before the International Court of Justice and the principle of equality of arms being undermined actually exists in the view of the publicity given to other procedural acts available on the official website of the International Court of Justice and in the view of the EU’s well-known position regarding the blatant illegality of the Russian invasion of Ukraine;
—annul the contested decision;
—order the Commission to pay all costs.
In support of the action seeking annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission rejecting the confirmatory application to access documents relating to information provided by the EU to the International Court of Justice in the Ukraine-Russia case, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging, principally, infringement of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1049/2001.
2.Second plea in law, alleging, principally, failure to fulfil the obligation to state reasons.
3.Third plea in law, alleging, alternatively, that the second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1049/2001 does not prevent the communication of the documents requested.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging, alternatively, that there is an overriding public interest in the disclosure of the documents requested.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4598/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *