- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-831/16: Action brought on 28 November 2016 — Kabushiki Kaisha Zoom v EUIPO — Leedsworld (ZOOM)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0831
62016TN0831
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.1.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 22/57
(Case T-831/16)
(2017/C 022/76)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Kabushiki Kaisha Zoom (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: M. de Arpe Tejero, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Leedsworld, Inc. (New Kensington, Pennsylvania, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ZOOM’ — Application for registration No 11 766 111
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 September 2016 in Case R 1235/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject entirely the EU trade mark No 11 766 111 ‘ZOOM’ for class 9;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.