I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-224/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Competition - Concentrations - Belgian energy market - Decision declaring a merger to be compatible with the common market - Commitments given during the initial phase of the investigation - Decision refusing the partial referral of the merger investigation to the national authorities - Action for annulment - Consumer association - Interest in bringing proceedings - Failure to initiate the in-depth review procedure - Procedural rights - Inadmissibility)
2011/C 347/48
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Association belge des consommateurs test-achats ASBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fratini and F. Filpo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan, A. Antoniadis and R. Sauer, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Électricité de France (EDF), (Paris, France), (represented initially by C. Lazarus, A. Amsellem and A. Fontanille, and subsequently by C. Lazarus and A. Creus Carreras, lawyers)
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decisions C(2009) 9059 and C(2009) 8954 of 12 November 2009, the former declaring a merger to be compatible with the common market (Case COMP/M.5549 — EDF/Segebel) under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1), and the latter rejecting a request from the Belgian competition authorities for partial referral of the case in accordance with Article 9 of that regulation.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
2.Orders the Association belge des consommateurs test-achats ASBL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders Électricité de France (EDF) to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.