I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.2.2024
(C/2024/1259)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Primagran sp. z o.o. (Stegna, Poland) (represented by: R. Skubisz and T. Drab, radcy prawni, and E. Stec-Dobroczyńska, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Primagaz SAS (Paris, France)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark PRIMA — European Union trade mark No 18 024 541
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 October 2023 in Case R 213/2023-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant, and in case the other party before the Board of Appeal joins the proceedings, the intervener, to bear the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR;
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR;
—Breach of legitimate expectations.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1259/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)