EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-415/10: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2013 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy (Public supply contracts — Euratom — Public procurement procedure of the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy — Supply of electrical equipment — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Open procedure — Bid containing reservations — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectation — Proportionality — Conflict of interests — Awarding decision — Action for annulment — Not directly concerned — Inadmissibility — Non-contractual liability)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0415

62010TA0415

March 20, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/16

(Case T-415/10)(1)

(Public supply contracts - Euratom - Public procurement procedure of the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy - Supply of electrical equipment - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Open procedure - Bid containing reservations - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectation - Proportionality - Conflict of interests - Awarding decision - Action for annulment - Not directly concerned - Inadmissibility - Non-contractual liability)

2013/C 129/30

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nexans France (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-P. Tran Thiet, J.-F. Le Corre and M. Pigeat, lawyers)

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Verpont, acting as Agent, and C. Kennedy-Loest, T. Christopher, Solicitors, J. Derenne, N. Pourbaix, lawyers, and M. Farley, Solicitor)

Re:

Firstly, annulment of the decision rejecting the bid submitted by the applicant and the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, secondly, a claim for compensation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Nexans France to pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings.

(1)

OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

* * *

Language of the case: French

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia