- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-219/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against QS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0219
62022CN0219
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 266/11
(Case C-219/22)
(2022/C 266/13)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Party to the main proceedings
Question referred
Must Article 3(3) of Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA (1) of 24 July 2008 on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as Article 68(1) of the NK, in conjunction with Article 8(2) thereof, which provides that the national court seised of an application for execution of the sentence imposed by a previous conviction handed down by a court of another Member State may, for that purpose, alter the arrangements for executing that sentence by ordering its actual execution?
(1) OJ 2008 L 220, p. 32.
* * *