- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-472/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 20 October 2014 — Canadian Oil Company Sweden AB, Anders Rantén v Riksåklagaren
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0472
62014CN0472
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.12.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 448/15
(Case C-472/14)
(2014/C 448/19)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Canadian Oil Company Sweden AB, Anders Rantén
Defendant: Riksåklagaren
Questions referred
1)Does it run counter to REACH (1) that a person who, in the course of a business, imports a chemical product into Sweden — in respect of which there is an obligation to notify under REACH — must notify it in accordance with the Swedish legislation to the Kemikalieinspektionen for registration in the Swedish product register?
2)If the answer to question 1 is negative, does the Swedish obligation to notify run counter to Article 34 TFEU, having regard to the exceptions in Article 36 TFEU?
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1).