I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark WELCO - Earlier EU figurative mark WELCO - No recording of the change in ownership of the contested trade mark in the EU trade mark register - No locus standi - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3335)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG (Hanau, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and A. Söder, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Welco spol. s r. o. (Uherský Brod, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 June 2023 (Case R 2409/2022-2).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs before the General Court and pay those incurred by Welco spol. s r. o.
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3335/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—