- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-760/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0760
62017TA0760
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 155/41
(Case T-760/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Right to be heard)
(2019/C 155/48)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Meesenburg Großhandel KG (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Freiherr von Oldershausen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2017 (Case R 1786/2016-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Triotherm+ as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action.
2.Orders Meesenburg Großhandel KG to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019155EN.01004101-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019155EN.01004101-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.